TOPIC 04 OF 06

Transparency and disclosure

Telling people it's AI
PLAIN-LANGUAGE IDEA

A distinct, lighter-touch duty applies broadly: people generally have a right to know when they're interacting with an AI system or looking at AI-generated or manipulated content. This is separate from permission and separate from the heavier high-risk duties — it's about honesty. Chatbots should not pose as human, and synthetic media (deepfakes, generated images) increasingly must be marked as such.

SEE IT IN A SITUATION
A support chatbot opens by making clear it's an automated assistant, not a person. A marketing image generated by AI carries a label. Neither is burdensome, and skipping them erodes exactly the trust the tool depends on.
DO NOT MISS THIS

Disclosure answers 'is this AI?' — it does not answer 'were we allowed to use what's in it?' Don't let a transparency label stand in for the copyright, likeness, or fairness questions it doesn't touch.

TRY THIS NOW

Check one AI-facing thing you run: is it obvious to the person that it's AI, and is generated content marked? If not, that's a cheap, high-trust fix.

CONNECTED LANDMARKS
Important topics change.

Environmental impact, copyright, privacy, security, and EU obligations require dated sources and context. The Atlas teaches durable decision habits and clearly separates them from legal or professional advice.