LANDMARK · 7 MIN · JUDGE

The EU risk lens

After this landmark, you can place a use into the right EU AI Act risk tier and reason about what that placement implies.

EU context
This concept is shared, but the Everyday lens is less central here.

You can still explore it. We’re showing the shared explanation and a related practical view without hiding the knowledge.

SHARED FOUNDATION

The EU AI Act regulates AI by the risk of its use rather than by the cleverness of the model. A small set of uses are banned outright; some are treated as high-risk and carry substantial duties; some trigger transparency obligations, like telling people they’re interacting with AI or looking at synthetic media; and the large remainder is largely unrestricted. The obligations attach to how a system is used, so the first practical question is “which tier is this use in?”, not “are we allowed to use AI?”. Getting the tier right is what tells you what you must do before anything else.

This is the canonical concept. It stays the same across learner lenses so personalization never changes the underlying facts.

EVERYDAY LENS

What this looks like for you

As a member of the public you mostly meet the transparency tier: you generally have a right to know when you’re dealing with AI or synthetic media.

MAKE A DECISION

Your team wants to use AI to screen job applicants. What’s the first thing to establish?

CARRY THISTake one AI use you’re considering and name its likely tier: prohibited, high-risk, transparency, or minimal — and note why.
PRACTICE THIS
CONCEPTS IN THE INDEX